TerraMaster has individual apps for each service, while QNAP offered more built-in cloud connections-35, as of this writing-accessible through its Hybrid Backup Sync software. ![]() Asustor’s offerings were more limited, with access to services spread across three apps. Those who like to keep and view family photo albums on their NAS will find a lot to love in Synology Photos, a powerful photo library that offers automated albums and facial recognition-both features you can get from QNAP, but in our experience, Synology’s implementation does a better job filtering out faces you wouldn’t want to categorize, like those in posters in the background.Īs of the time of this writing, Synology also offered robust compatibility with 22 cloud backup services via its Cloud Sync app, from the most popular consumer-level products like Google Drive or Microsoft One Drive to business-oriented options from Rackspace and OpenStack Swift. We were able to get it connected to and syncing bi-directionally in just a couple of minutes, with prompts for data encryption and scheduling along the way-you can even set it to only sync specific folders. It supports all the major players in cloud backups, and setup is very straightforward. Owners of the DS220+ will be pleased with its refined appearance, tool-less drive installation, quick setup, and easy configuration. ![]() And those with network equipment supporting link aggregation may use the Synology’s dual gigabit port as a single logical link and get a throughput boost that way. This 2-bay NAS comes in at $300, has a powerful CPU capable of hardware transcoding some 4K content on the fly, provides a good first-party software experience, and it has the sleekest, most refined OS of the bunch. Among the devices tested, when considering all of these things put together, the Synology DS220+ came out on top. When looking at the best network-attached device for most needs-no matter what the device-we generally want to know how user-friendly it is, how versatile, how well it performs, how much it costs, how it looks, and how it sounds (where applicable). Limited official support for third-party software But if you think there’s a chance you’ll be doing heavy hardware acceleration, or you’ll be using it as a virtual machine to run Linux from, you’ll want to look into devices that have more RAM (or at least are expandable in that department) and devices with better CPUs and even those with dedicated GPUs. For most home users, these don’t need to be especially high-2GB of RAM or less will take care of any backups you need, and putting your NAS to work as a media server will likely be fine. Hardware Specifications: A NAS is essentially a small computer, and as such, specifications like RAM and CPU are important considerations, also depending on your use case. But if,say, you want to network multiple NAS devices together or you’d like your device to serve as a cloud music server that you can reach no matter where you are, then you need to verify that the model you’re considering can do what you want, and be sure it does so without much hassle. When it comes to local backups and Plex support, for the most part you can choose whatever NAS you’d like. Interface and Features: The emphasis on this is weakening as time goes on and NAS makers’ user interfaces become more refined-and their features largely reach parity with one another-but you are going to want to do some research to make sure that a given NAS will accommodate your use case. ![]() ![]() If you already have drives you would like to use, or are preparing to migrate an old NAS to a new one, it would be in your best interest to check the drive compatibility list of prospective manufacturers for the most up-to-date lists of drives tested and confirmed to work with your NAS device. Synology updated its policy last year, to some consternation amongst users, in such a way that many drives were released from its list of supported devices. Which of the too is best is beyond the scope of this article, but it would be best to familiarize yourself with them to some degree while deciding on your purchase.ĭrive Compatibility: Believe it or not, not every NAS is fully compatible with every drive you can fit inside it, and your choices may become more limited as time goes on. Without going too deep, ext4 was built on ext3 and is generally considered more stable, while Btrfs offers newer features and is designed specifically for NAS in a way that ext4 was not. There are two primary file systems in use in the products we tested for this page: ext4 and Btrfs. Internal File System Support: Different NAS offer different file system support, which can have bearing on a user’s choice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |